SEBATIK is a collection of research articles, scientific works, and dedication from all academic community in order to integrate information. SEBATIK provides open publication services for all members of the public, both in all tertiary educational and teacher environments and other research institutions, with the freedom to exchange information that is dedicated to facilitating collaboration between researchers, writers and readers through information exchange. SEBATIK was introduced and developed in the STMIK Widya Cipta Dharma environment since 2001 and is wide open for continuous development.
SEBATIK is published periodically twice a year, namely June and December, this Journal contains the results of research activities, discoveries and ideas in the field of ICT (Information and Communication Technology) covering the topics of information systems, artificial intelligence, multimedia technology, and others. SEBATIK is also open to topics of research and service outside the field of ICT topics such as topics on public relations, economic improvement, and others. Hopefully with the articles in cultivation researchers can share knowledge in order to advance Indonesia, especially East Kalimantan.
Focus and Scope
Information and communication technology
Research and Community/Public Service
Technology for East Kalimantan
Peer Review Process
The following is the rule in the process jurnal SEBATIK of STMIK Widya Cipta Dharma. Scientific works that go to the editorial will be done by the reviewer process in accordance with Standard Operating Procedures (SOP) as follows:
- The reviewer's team consists of researchers, lecturers, practitioners who have tested their scholarship.
- The review process takes place at least 4 weeks from the time your paper goes to the OJS system, sooner or later the reviewer process depends on the active participation of the author and the reviewer team.
- It is expected that the author/writer remembers the username and password in OJS because the reviewer process will be done in the system (online), make sure the email and biodata you input are correct.
- The reviewer process is done through the online system so that if your paper has to be repaired/revised it will be informed quickly through the registered email author and you should upload your paper repair through your account.
- It is expected that the active participation of the author to simplify the reviewer process, Editor is not responsible if the paper you want to publish on Reject by the reviewer team.
- Once accepted Acceptance then the next process is the process of payment of journal publications = IDR 300.000,-
This journal utilizes the LOCKSS system to create a distributed archiving system among participating libraries and permits those libraries to create permanent archives of the journal for purposes of preservation and restoration. More...
Screening for Plagiarism
To check Plagiarism manuscript submitted using the application Turnitin
Publication Ethics and Malpractice Statement
Jurnal SEBATIK is a peer-reviewed electronic journal. This statement clarifies the ethical behaviour of all parties involved in the act of publishing an article in this journal, including the author, the chief editor, the Editorial Board, the peer-reviewer and the publisher. This statement is based on COPE’s Best Practice Guidelines for Journal Editors.
Ethical Guideline for Journal Publication
The publication of an article in a peer-reviewed Jurnal SEBATIK is an essential building block in the development of a coherent and respected network of knowledge. It is a direct reflection of the quality of the work of the authors and the institutions that support them. Peer-reviewed articles support and embody the scientific method. It is, therefore, important to agree upon standards of expected ethical behaviour for all parties involved in the act of publishing: the author, the journal editor, the peer reviewer, the publisher and the society.
The editor of the Jurnal SEBATIK is responsible for deciding which of the articles submitted to the journal should be published. The validation of the work in question and its importance to researchers and readers must always drive such decisions. The editors may be guided by the policies of the journal's editorial board and constrained by such legal requirements as shall then be in force regarding libel, copyright infringement and plagiarism. The editors may confer with other editors or reviewers in making this decision.
An editor at any time evaluates manuscripts for their intellectual content without regard to race, gender, sexual orientation, religious belief, ethnic origin, citizenship, or political philosophy of the authors.
The editor and any editorial staff must not disclose any information about a submitted manuscript to anyone other than the corresponding author, reviewers, potential reviewers, other editorial advisers, and the publisher, as appropriate.
Disclosure and conflicts of interest
Unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript must not be used in an editor's own research without the express written consent of the author.
Duties of Editor
The editor responsible for receiving submissions should be sent by the authors. In the process of editing the manuscript, the editor in conducting the assessment must still prioritize the weight of scientific articles were examined, with prejudice to race, gender, ethnicity, religion, nationality and political views of the writer. The editors are not allowed to conceal information about the article in question, except to the authors, bestari partners and publishers. If the manuscripts are accepted less worthy of publication, the editors must maintain the confidentiality of the manuscript, so as not to be used by others, except by permission of the authors.
Duties of Reviewers
Contribution to Editorial Decisions
Peer review assists the editor in making editorial decisions and through the editorial communications with the author may also assist the author in improving the paper.
Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process.
Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. They must not be shown to or discussed with others except as authorized by the editor.
Standards of Objectivity
Reviews should be conducted objectively. Personal criticism of the author is inappropriate. Referees should express their views clearly with supporting arguments.
Acknowledgment of Sources
Reviewers should identify relevant published work that has not been cited by the authors. Any statement that observation, derivation, or argument had been previously reported should be accompanied by the relevant citation. A reviewer should also call to the editor's attention any substantial similarity or overlap between the manuscript under consideration and any other published paper of which they have personal knowledge.
Disclosure and Conflict of Interest
Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.
Duties of Authors
Authors of reports of original research should present an accurate account of the work performed as well as an objective discussion of its significance. Underlying data should be represented accurately in the paper. A paper should contain sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the work. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable.
Data Access and Retention
Authors are asked to provide the raw data in connection with a paper for editorial review, and should be prepared to provide public access to such data (consistent with the ALPSP-STM Statement on Data and Databases), if practicable, and should in any event be prepared to retain such data for a reasonable time after publication.
Originality and Plagiarism
The authors should ensure that they have written entirely original works, and if the authors have used the work and/or words of others that this has been appropriately cited or quoted.