PENGARUH APLIKASI EVALUASI MODEL CIPP YANG DIINTEGRASIKAN DENGAN METODE SAW TERHADAP EFEKTIVITAS PELAKSANAAN E-LEARNING
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46984/sebatik.v25i2.1462Keywords:
Evaluasi, CIPP, SAW, Efektivitas, E-LearningAbstract
Evaluasi penting dilaksanakan pada berbagai kegiatan dalam bidang pendidikan, begitu juga secara khusus dalam proses pembelajaran di bidang kesehatan. Kegiatan evaluasi dilaksanakan untuk mengetahui keberhasilan pendidikan. Model evaluasi di bidang pendidikan sangat beraneka jenisnya, namun model yang sering digunakan pada bidang pendidikan kesehatan yaitu formative-summative, dikarenakan pada bidang ini dilakukan evaluasi saat proses pembelajaran berjalan dan setelah pembelajaran selesai. Penelitian ini adalah penelitian jenis deskriptif korelasional, dimana bertujuan untuk memperoleh gambaran tentang hubungan antara pemakaian aplikasi evaluasi CIPP-SAW (Context, Input, Process, Product- Simple Additive Weighting) terhadap efektivitas pelaksanaan e-learning di perguruan tinggi kesehatan di Bali. Metode yang digunakan untuk menganalisis data adalah analisis statistik parametrik. Seluruh kegiatan analisis data dilakukan dengan bantuan SPSS 21.0 for windows untuk mendapatkan hasil yang akurat. Sebelum melakukan pengolahan data dan analis statistik dalam rangka pengujian analisis regresi, terlebih dahulu dilakukan uji persyaratan analisis, agar kesimpulan yang ditarik memenuhi persyaratan. Adapun uji persyaratan analisis hipotesis adalah uji normalitas data, uji linieritas data, dan uji auto korelasi data. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa terdapat pengaruh/hubungan positif dan signifikan antara pemakaian aplikasi evaluasi CIPP-SAW dan efektivitas pelaksanaan e-learning pada perguruan tinggi kesehatan di Bali. Hal ini ditunjukkan dari nilai koefisien korelasi sebesar 0,963 dan nilai koefisien determinasi sebesar 0,927, atau variasi efektivitas pelaksanaan e-learning sebesar 92,7% dapat dijelaskan oleh variabel aplikasi evaluasi CIPP-SAW.
References
An, Y., & Mindrila, D. (2020). Strategies and Tools Used for Learner-Centered Instruction. International Journal of Technology in Education and Science, 4(2), 133–143.
Ariawan, I.P.W., Giri, M.K.W., & Divayana, D.G.H. (2019a). Preliminary Design of CIPP-SAW Evaluation Model in Measuring ICT-Based Learning Effectiveness in Health Colleges. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1402, 1–6.
Ariawan, I.P.W., Giri, M.K.W., & Divayana, D.G.H. (2019b). “The CIPP-SAW Evaluation Model Design in Measurement the Effectiveness of E-Learning at Health Universities in Bali. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Information Technology, 97(21), 2922–2934.
Ariawan, I.P.W., Giri, M.K.W., & Divayana, D.G.H. (2020). Simulation of SAW-Based CIPP Evaluation Model Calculation in Determining Improvement Priority for E-Learning Services. 4th International Conference on Vocational Education and Training (ICOVET), Malang, Indonesia, 1–6.
Barteit, S., Guzek, D., Jahn, A., Bärnighausen, T., Jorge, M.M., & Neuhann, F. (2020). Evaluation of E-Learning for Medical Education in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Systematic Review. Computers & Education, 145, 1–18.
Browne, G.R., Bender, H., Bradley, J., & Pang, A. (2020). Evaluation of a Tertiary Sustainability Experiential Learning Program. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 21(4), 699–715.
Can, D., & Can, V. (2020). Fairness in Resource Distribution: Relationship between Children’s Moral Reasoning and Logical Reasoning. Acta Educationis Generalis, 10(3), 66–86.
Chin, R.Y.K., Tjahjono, R., Rutledge, M.J.R., Lambert, T., & Deboever, N. (2019). The Evaluation of E-Learning Resources as An Adjunct to Otolaryngology Teaching: A Pilot Study. BMC Medical Education, 19, 1–9.
Divayana, D.G.H. (2016). Evaluasi Program Perpustakaan Digital Berbasis Sistem Pakar Pada Universitas Teknologi Indonesia. Jakarta: Universitas Negeri Jakarta.
Eze, S.C., Chinedu-Eze, V.C.A., Okike, C.K., & Bello, A.O. (2020). Factors Influencing the Use of E-Learning Facilities by Students in a Private Higher Education Institution (HEI) in a Developing Economy. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 7, 1–15.
Gübes, N., & Uyar, S. (2020). Comparing Performance of Different Equating Methods in Presence and Absence of DIF Items in Anchor Test. International Journal of Progressive Education, 16(3), 111–122.
Li, K.C., Lee, L.Y.K., Wong, S.L., Yau, I.S.Y., & Wong, B.T.M. (2019). Evaluation of Mobile Learning for the Clinical Practicum in Nursing Education: Application of the FRAME Model. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 31(2), 290–310.
Muhyidin, A., Juansah, D.E., Ediwarman, & Hamidiyah, A. (2018). Does the Writing Argumentative Text Ability Correlate to Writing Motivation and Grammatical Competence?. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, 263, 239–243.
Öztürk-Pat, Ö., & Yilmaz, M. (2021). Impact of Creative Drama Method on Students’ Speaking Skills. Journal of Theoretical Educational Science, 14(2), 223–245.
Rasouli, A., Rahbania, Z., & Attaran, M. (2016). Students’ Readiness for E-Learning Application in Higher Education. Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Technology, 4(3), 51–64.
Raycroft, M.A.R., & Flynn, A.B. (2020). What Works? What’s Missing? An Evaluation Model for Science Curricula That Analyses Learning Outcomes through Five Lenses. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 21(4), 1110–1131.
Setiawan, R., & Munajah, R. (2020). Evaluation of the Application of Online Learning in Indonesian Universities. TEM Journal, 9(3), 1194–1199.
Susac, A., Bubic, A., Martinjak, P., Planinic, M., & Palmovic, M. (2017). Graphical Representations of Data Improve Student Understanding of Measurement and Uncertainty: An Eye-Tracking Study. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 13(2), 1–20.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors retain all their rights to the published works, such as (but not limited to) the following rights; Copyright and other proprietary rights relating to the article, such as patent rights, The right to use the substance of the article in own future works, including lectures and books, The right to reproduce the article for own purposes, The right to self-archive the article
