MODEL KEMATANGAN E-GOVERNMENT BERDASARKAN SPBE DI DINAS ESDM BANDUNG
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46984/sebatik.v27i2.2388Keywords:
Model Kematangan, Egovernment, Dinas ESDM, SPBE, Domain infrastruktur.Abstract
Tata kelola pemerintahan di Indonesia pada era teknologi 4.0 diharuskan mengikuti perubahan dan menampung setiap aspirasi masyarakat secara cepat, efisien, efektif dan transparan. Namun, Hasil survey United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) PBB menunjukkan bahwa Indonesia masih jauh tertinggal dalam hal adopsi e- government, di tingkat Asia pun Indonesia berada di bawah Vietnam dan Philipina apalagi jika dibandingkan dengan negara maju. Oleh karena itu, kami melakukan penelitian ini untuk mengukur tingkat kematangan e-Government berdasarkan SPBE yang dilakukan di Dinas ESDM Bandung dengan menggunakan metode penelitian deskriptif dengan pendekatan kuantitatif. Penelitian ini berdasarkan hasil survei yang dibagi ke dalam 4 domain yaitu domain aplikasi, domain infrastruktur, domain kemanan informasi dan domain tata kelola dan manajemen IT berdasarkan evaluasi SPBE. Hasil dari penelitian ini adalah domain tata kelola dan manajemen IT memperoleh nilai kematangan 0.63, domain infrastruktur memperoleh nilai kematangan 1.80 domain aplikasi memperoleh nilai kematangan 1.53, dan domain keamanan informasi memperoleh nilai kematangan 0.5 dimana masing-masing nilai-nilai tersebut masih jauh dari kategori matang. Dikatakan matang bila hasil survei pada masing-masing domain memiliki nilai 4. Setiap domain yang belum matang dianalisis berdasarkan hasil asesmen dan diberikan rekomendasi agar ketika dilakukan pengukuran asesmen kembali pada periode berikutnya ada peningkatan pada bidang egovernment di Dinas ESDM Bandung.
References
Akbar, M. M. (2020). Evaluasi Tingkat Kematangan E-government Dan Partisipasi Masyarakat dalam Pelayanan Publik (Studi Kasus Kabupaten Sukoharjo). Universitas Islam Indonesia.
Azpriyanne Cahyono, S., Mukaromah, S., & Anita, W. (2023). Perancangan Alat Ukur Tingkat Kapabilitas Manajemen Perubahan SPBE Menggunakan Kerangka Kerja Cobit 5. Juitik, 3(3). https://doi.org/10.55606/juitik.v3i3.615
Bagus Wibisono, S., & Sensuse, D. (2018). Combination Of Cmmi-Dev And Cmmi-Svc To Measure Implementation Maturity Of E-Government: A Systematic Literature Review. Jurnal Masyarakat Telematika Dan Informasi, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.17933/mti.v9i1.97
BPK. (2006). Kebijakan dan Strategi Nasional Pengembangan E-Government. Database Peraturan Perundang-Undangan. https://peraturan.go.id
Deddy Kurniawan, D., & Sutabri, T. (2023). Analisis IT Services Management (ITSM) Layanan Sistem Informasi Meteorologi Penerbangan Menggunakan Framework Cobit 5. Indonesian Journal of Multidisicplinary on Social and Technology, 1(3). https://doi.org/10.31004/ijmst.v1i3.159
Departemen Komunikasi dan Informatika. (2007). Panduan Umum Tata kelola TIK Nasional. Departemen Komunikasi dan Informatika. https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Details/159939/permenkominfo-no-41permenkominfo112007-tahun
Dhiaaul Kusnaa Washilatul Arba’ah, Z., Utami, E., & Hendi Muhammad, A. (2023). Information & Technology Audit of Egovernment using COBIT a Literature Review. JIKO, 6(1). https://ejournal.unkhair.ac.id/index.php/jiko/article/view/5606/3778
Dong-Young, K., & Gerald, G. (2010). E‐government maturity model using the capability maturity model integration. Journal of Systems and Information Technology, 12(3). https://doi.org/10.1108/13287261011070858
Gębczyńska, A., & Vladova, K. (2023). Comparative Analysis Of Selected Process Maturity Assessment Models Applied In The Public Sector. Business Process Management Journal, 29(3). https://doi.org/10.1108/BPMJ-09-2022-0420
Guntur Utomo, R., Andrian, R., & Wills, G. (2023). An Overview On Information Assurance Framework For Smart Government In Indonesia. Proceedings Of The 7th International Conference On Science And Technology, 2654(1). https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0114460
Hasan, A., & Assaf, A. (2018). Pengukuran Tingkat Kematangan E-Goverment Pada Pemerintah Daerah Kepulauan. Protek, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.33387/protk.v5i1.622
ISACA. (2018a). COBIT 5 Enabling Process. Rolling. ISACA. https://www.isaca.org/resources/cobit/cobit-5
ISACA. (2018b). COBIT 5 Process-Assessment Model.
ISACA. (2018c). COBIT Framework.
ISACA. (2018d). COBIT Implementation. ISACA.
Karen, L., & Jungwoo, L. (2001). Developing fully functional E-government: A four stage model. Government Information Quarterly, 18(2). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0740-624X(01)00066-1
Menteri Pendayagunaan Aparatur Negara dan Reformasi Birokrasi Republik Indonesia. (2018). Pedoman Evaluasi Sistem Pemerintahan Berbasis Elektronik. Menteri Pendayagunaan Aparatur Negara dan Reformasi Birokrasi Republik Indonesia. https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Download/123284/permenpan%20no%205%20tahun%202018.pdf
Narayan Patil, P., Namdev Rakhunde, H., & Hemant Jethwa, A. (2016). CMMI-Its Need in the Industry. International Journal of Recent Scientific Research, 7(4). http://www.recentscientific.com/sites/default/files/5008.pdf
Nursafitri, S., & Jayadi, R. (2023). Evaluation of Electronic-Based Government System Using The E-Government Maturity Model: Case Study of Bekasi City. Jurnal Minfo Polgan, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.33395/jmp.v12i1.12455
Patergiannaki, Z., & Pollalis, Y. (2022). E-Government Maturity Assessment: Evidence from Greek Municipalities. Policy and Internet, 15(1). https://doi.org/10.1002/poi3.317
Ramadhane, T., Ramadani, L., & Abdurrahman, L. (2023). Development of Public Value Based E-Government Maturity Framework. Technium Science, 16(Special Issue). https://doi.org/10.47577/technium.v16i.9950
Sekaran, U., & Bougie, R. (2019). Research Methods For Business: A Skill Building Approach 8th Edition. Wiley.
Sudiantara, I. G. (2021). Measuring Maturity Level On The Process Of Developing An Online Presence System With CMMI Framework. International Journal of Engineering and Emerging Technology, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.24843/IJEET.2021.v06.i01.p18
Sumijan, S. (2020). Analisis Dan Evaluasi Tingkat Kematangan E-Government Pada Information Architecture Menggunakan Framework Cobit 5 (Studi Kasus: Pemerintah Daerah Kota Padang). Seminar Nasional Teknologi Informasi Komunikasi Dan Industri. https://ejournal.uin-suska.ac.id/index.php/SNTIKI/article/view/10956
United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs. (2022). UN E-Govenment Survey 2022: E-Government in Support of Sustainable Development. United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs.
United-Nations. (2012). UN E-Government Survey 2012: E-Government for the People. United-Nations.
Viborg Andersen, K., & Sinner Henriksen, H. (2006). E-government maturity models: Extension of the Layne and Lee model. Government Information Quarterly, 23(2). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2005.11.008
Widiastuti, I. (2022). Kematangan Pelayanan Komunikasi Egovernment di Surabaya. Mediakom, 6(1). http://dx.doi.org/10.35760/mkm.2022.v6i1.6537
Yuda Saputra, M. R., Wahyu Winarno, W., Henderi, H., & Shaddiq, S. (2020). Evaluation of Maturity Level of the Electronic based Government System in the Department of Industry and Commerce of Banjar Regency. Journal of Robotics and Control, 1(5). https://journal.umy.ac.id/index.php/jrc/article/view/8005
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Endang Amalia
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain all their rights to the published works, such as (but not limited to) the following rights; Copyright and other proprietary rights relating to the article, such as patent rights, The right to use the substance of the article in own future works, including lectures and books, The right to reproduce the article for own purposes, The right to self-archive the article
