The Influence of a Meritocracy System on the Quality of Public Services

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.46984/sebatik.v29i2.2674

Keywords:

Merit System, Work Motivation, Service Quality, SERVQUAL, PLS-SEM

Abstract

This study examines the relationship between the merit system and the quality of public services, with the work motivation of state civil apparatus (ASN) as a mediator, using a case study in the West Sumbawa Regency Government. The background of the study is based on the need to strengthen bureaucratic professionalism through recruitment, promotion, competency development, and talent management practices based on qualifications and performance, amidst implementation challenges at the regional level influenced by limited capacity and a patronage culture. The research aims to build an empirical understanding of the extent to which the merit system affects the quality of public services, both directly and indirectly, through increased work motivation. This study uses a quantitative cross-sectional approach with a Likert scale-based instrument to measure the dimensions of meritocracy, work motivation, and public service quality adapted from the SERVQUAL model. Data analysis was performed using Partial Least Squares-Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM), testing construct validity and reliability, as well as the significance of direct and indirect paths. The findings show that all merit components—from recruitment to talent management—significantly influence the formation of a strong merit system, with the greatest impact coming from competency development and talent management. The established merit system contributes positively to public service quality, reflected in the dimensions of reliability, responsiveness, assurance, empathy, and tangibles, with work motivation proven to partially mediate this relationship. These results affirm the importance of integrating merit-based HRM policies with strategies to strengthen ASN motivation as a continuous effort to improve service quality and public trust.

References

Abduh, M., Alawiyah, T., Apriansyah, G., Sirodj, R. A., & Afgani, M. W. (2023). Survey design: Cross sectional dalam penelitian kualitatif. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains Dan Komputer, 3(01), 31–39.

Adventy, M. I. Y., Tarizah, D. A., & Rafinzar, R. (2024). Tren Penelitian Pada Kualitas Layanan Publik Di Dunia: Blibliometric Analysis. Jurnal Borneo Akcaya, 10(1), 111–121.

Aminuddin, A., & Rindaningsih, I. (2025). Peran Sentral Pengembangan Sumber Daya Manusia Aparatur Melalui Meritokrasi. AL-DYAS Учредители: Darul Yasin Al Sys, 4(1), 504–517.

Bachmid, S. (2023). Dimensi Kualitas Layanan di Perguruan Tinggi. Deepublish.

Brierley, S. (2021). Combining Patronage And Merit In Public Sector Recruitment. The Journal of Politics, 83(1), 182–197.

Duong, H. (2021). The Politicization Of Civil Service Recruitment And Promotion In Vietnam. Public Administration and Development, 41(2), 51–62.

Effendy, M. A., Sukarman, H., Budiaman, H., Perdana, M. P., & Rahayu, L. P. (2024). Meningkatkan Kinerja Aparatur Sipil Negara Melalui Sistem Merit Dihubungkan dengan Penerapan Undang-Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2023 tentang Aparatur Sipil Negara. Jurnal Ilmiah Galuh Justisi, 12(1), 116–127.

Elazhari, E., & Siregar, B. (2025). Reformasi Birokrasi dan Tantangan Tata Kelola Pemerintahan yang Baik di Tingkat Lokal: Analisis Kritis Terhadap Implementasi Sistem Merit. All Fields of Science Journal Liaison Academia and Sosiety, 5(2), 138–149.

Fauzan, H. S., & Setiawan, A. (2023). Pengaruh Kualitas Pelayanan Terhadap Kepuasan Masyarakat Di Seksi Pengujian Kendaraan Bermotor Dinas Perhubungan Kabupaten Garut. Jurnal Pembangunan Dan Kebijakan Publik, 14(2), 61–68.

Ginting, T. K. J., & Rizky, M. C. (2025). Analisis Pengaruh Kepemimpinan, Kompensasi, Stress Kerja, Dan Motivasi Kerja Terhadap Prestasi Kerja Asn Kejaksaan Negeri Tanjung Balai. Majalah Ekonomi, 31(1), 145–158.

Gultom, D. N., Khairina, E., & Salsabila, L. (2024). Analisis efisiensi dan efektivitas e-government dalam administrasi publik. PUBLIKA: Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi Publik, 10(1), 128–136.

Irawan, E. P., Minarsi, A., Rianty, E., Halim, B., Putri, R. N. I., & Juansa, A. (2025). Komunikasi Pelayanan Publik. Star Digital Publishing.

Mamshae, A. (2025). Between merit and patronage: Hybrid appointments of top civil service. Governance, 38(2), e12914.

Morgan, D. F., Green, R. T., Shinn, C. W., Robinson, K. S., & Banyan, M. E. (2021). Foundations Of Public Service: E Pluribus Unum. Routledge.

Mozin, S. Y., Kasim, F. N., & Djafar, K. (2025). Analisis Indeks Kepuasan Masyarakat Dalam Peningkatan Kualitas Pelayanan Publik Indonesia. Journal Central Publisher, 3(4), 3478–3486.

Prabaningrum, M. D. (2024). Studi Efektivitas Frontliner dalam menangani Keluhan Nasabah dan Pengaruhnya Terhadap Kepuasan Nasabah Bank Pada PT Bank Rakyat Indonesia (Persero) Tbk. Universitas Islam Indonesia.

Simorangkir, N. Z., & Ali, H. (2024). Pengaruh Transformasi Digital, Budaya Organisasi dan Lingkungan Kerja terhadap Strategi Pemasaran. Dinasti Health and Pharmacy Science, 1(4), 156–166.

Sukrilah, P., Bimo, W. A., & Firdaus, M. A. (2024). Pengaruh Motivasi Kerja Dan Disiplin Kerja Terhadap Kinerja Karyawan. Indonesian Journal of Innovation Multidisipliner Research, 2(4), 1–12.

Syamsir, M. S. (2023). Motivasi dan Motivasi Pelayanan Publik dalam Manajemen SDM Sektor Publik. PT. RajaGrafindo Persada-Rajawali Pers.

Toral, G. (2024). How patronage delivers: Political appointments, bureaucratic accountability, and service delivery in Brazil. American Journal of Political Science, 68(2), 797–815.

Turner, M., Prasojo, E., & Sumarwono, R. (2022). The Challenge Of Reforming Big Bureaucracy In Indonesia. Policy Studies, 43(2), 333–351.

Walton, N. (2025). The German Civil Service from the Kingdom of Prussia to the Federal Republic of Germany: the historical development of the Service, its principles, and its loyalties. University of Leicester.

Downloads

Published

2025-12-29

How to Cite

Qomar, M. and Ahkam, S. (2025) “The Influence of a Meritocracy System on the Quality of Public Services”, Sebatik, 29(2), pp. 548–555. doi: 10.46984/sebatik.v29i2.2674.